- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:32:42 -0500
- To: Brian Suda <brian.suda@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:09 +0000, Brian Suda wrote: > 2008/4/4 Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>: > > > > Did anybody else see this? > > > > "New profiles have been produced for more microformats. These can be > > optionally placed in the head element of a page to indicate the use of > > particular microformats." > > -- This Fortnight in Microformats - March 17th–30th > > http://microformats.org/blog/2008/04/01/this-fortnight-in-microformats-march-17th%e2%80%9330th/ > > > > > > Somebody issued http://purl.org/uF/2008/03/ as a combined profile; > > I'm not sure how much backing/endorsement it has yet. > > > > Brian? > > --- it seems to be the work of just one person who feels that the > world is collapsing without this and has gone off and done it himself. > IMHO He is pushing on all sorts of fronts that aren't really issues. One person... ok... nobody has undone or disclaimed his work at http://microformats.org/wiki/profile-uris ... sorta makes me wonder how much of the rest of the wiki is one-man-show stuff. > It seems like a duplication of work which is already in 2-3 other > places (gmpg.org, w3.org and microformats.org) now this. > > What are people's thoughts. Is it worthwhile to have a single master > profile, or is the modular approach better? more on that separately... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 7 April 2008 21:33:40 UTC