- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 13:12:37 +0100
- To: "Microformats Discuss" <microformats-discuss@microformats.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I just ran across a blogosphere thread starting somewhere around: http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/11/01/hcard-for-openid-simple-registration-and-attribute-exchange/ through http://willnorris.com/2007/11/hcard-is-not-a-provisioning-engine-for-private-data - which turns into concrete proposals on Tantek's blog. I'd like to comment specifically on this: [[ Modest proposal 3, in two parts: 1. Let's host the "official" "latest" hCard XMDP profile at http://microformats.org/profile/hcard 2. Let's create a set of HTTP redirects for appended /propertynames, ]] http://tantek.com/log/2007/11.html#d02t2318 Great! This is much more useful for interop than having to use Wiki page URLs as profile URIs, especially since they're not much good for machine-reading (I know 'people first' but computers need a little help putting them first...). There's already a hCard XMDP profile in place at http://www.w3.org/2006/03/hcard, which might be a possible alternative URI to http://microformats.org/profile/hcard, though I doubt whether much would break with a redirect on one end or the other. I'd also like to propose (again) that *all* the established microformats get more useful profile URIs, with XMDP documents and appropriate data-view linkage to support GRDDL on the microformat. A lot of these documents have already been prepared ready to deploy (I've done a couple myself), the only problem having been no microformats.org-approved locations for them. In the same way that hCard can be reused with OpenID, with profiles in place all the microformats can be reused with Semantic Web technologies with no extra cost to any publisher who is already following known best practices. Similarly, with profile URIs in place it's straightforward to produce quality microformat documents from RDF-modelled systems (e.g. see http://dannyayers.com/2007/11/04/foaf-sample-data-and -although I won't guarantee the quality there...). Speaking of best practices, maybe now would be a good time to say again that it would be good Web etiquette for the microformats community to encourage the use of HTML meta data profile URIs (through specification and leading-by-example), rather than claiming a set of short strings as their own. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linked_Data (btw, there are quite a few systems around which allow mapping between LDAP and RDF which should allow good integration between traditional ID provision and hCard) Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 12:13:02 UTC