- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:12:44 -0400
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <ogbujic@ccf.org>, <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> From: Dan Connolly [mailto:connolly@w3.org] > > Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > >> From: Chimezie Ogbuji [mailto:ogbujic@ccf.org] > >> . . . > >> I noticed there is a simultaneous TAG thread [1] on this > very topic. > >> > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2007May/0063.html > > > > Yes, that message from John Cowen is an excellent > > illustration of the > > fact that it only reliably makes sense to talk about the semantics > > (read: "GRDDL results") of a *representation* -- not an information > > resource. > > > I made a relevant change the GRDDL spec some months ago... > > --- > revision 1.188 > date: 2007/01/24 15:25:46; author: connolly; state: Exp; > lines: +115 -81 > * domain of grddl:transformation is now an XPath root node, rather > than an information resource, to fix the bug with multiple > representations that BrianM reported 2006-11-15. grddl:txlink goes > away as a result. > --- > > But for grdd:result itself, the rule concludes things about > the resource based on its representation... > > [[ > If an information resource([WEBARCH], section 2.2) IR is > represented by > an XML document with an XPath root node R, and R has a GRDDL > transformation with a transformation property TP, and TP applied to R > gives an RDF Graph[RDFC04] G, then G is a GRDDL result of IR. > ]] > -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#rule_result Right. That is exactly the problem. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 18:13:14 UTC