- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 14:29:57 +0100
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
See http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/pendinglist specifically the file http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/withErrors that includes one good and lots of bad transforms. Personally, I think even this test case is over-specifying error handling for GRDDL. Since the Jena GRDDL Reader passes, (to my surprise) I don't have sufficient grounds for voting against this test, but I would abstain. (It means somebody else also needs to propose this test, since I don't believe I can abstain on something I propose) Procedurally, if it makes the commentator happy, and the implementations pass, it makes sense to approve it. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 13:30:18 UTC