- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 21:01:41 +0100
- To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- CC: ogbujic@ccf.org, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Fabien Gandon wrote: > As for the url parameter I am inclined to keep it because in a number of > cases the produced RDF/XML is not directly used by the GRDDL agent that > knows the base url but is saved in a file and processed later. In these > cases, having a standalone RDF/XML output that includes the base is very > convenient since no post processing is required at all. Yes that is a use-case, but maybe it should be addressed in a different way ... e.g. read the GRDDL result as an RDF graph, and then reserialize it, using absolute URIs. It isn't a use-case in our use cases document, which is perhaps why we haven't met it the way you envisage. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 20:02:11 UTC