- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:11:30 -0400
- To: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>, "public-grddl-wg" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Okay, since DanC helped me get cvs access set up, I was able to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/test_results However, Chime in particular should please check it. Here are the main things I did in revision 1.23: - Commented out the "To Do" section as no longer relevant. Okay? - Deleted about 57 tests not marked "approved" from the table, leaving 59. Does that seem correct? If the "approved" column in that document was not up to date then I may have deleted too many. Note that after removing those, there were no informative tests remaining, AFAICT. Chime, please verify that that was the right thing to do. - Misc editorial improvements Below are the diffs from version 1.21 except for the deleted table entries. ------------------------------------------ 8,9c8,10 < <h1>GRDDL Implementation Report</h1> < --- > <div id="header"> > <span class="logo"><a href="/"><img src="/Icons/WWW/w3c_home_nb" alt="W3C" > height="48" width="72" /> </a></span> 11c12 < <a href="../">GRDDL WG</a> . <a href="testlist1">Test materials</a> --- > <a href="../">GRDDL WG</a> 13a15,16 > <h1>GRDDL Implementation Report</h1> > 19c22 < <p>We have test results in EARL/RDF from a three implementations:</p> --- > <p>We have test results in EARL/RDF from three implementations:</p> 35c38,39 < <p>Running the results through <a href="earlsum.py">earlsum.py</a> gives:</p> --- > <p>Running the results through <a href="earlsum.py">earlsum.py</a>, > and removing unapproved tests, gives:</p> 52c56 < <br />$Id: test_results.html,v 1.21 2007/06/29 19:39:56 connolly Exp $ --- > <br />$<!-- protect from cvs -->Id: WDTests.java 1393 2007-05-25 12:21:58Z jeremy_carroll $ 55c59 < <table> --- > <table border="1"> [ . . . omitted deleted table rows . . . ] 760c422 < <div><h2>@@stuff moved from the status section of the spec</h2> --- > <div><h2>Other implementations</h2> 763c425,427 < best-effort basis:</p> --- > best-effort basis, however these were not believed to be up-to-date > with the <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/">GRDDL specification</a> > when the above test results were generated:</p> 812a477 > <!-- COMMENTED OUT THE "TO DO" SECTION - No longer relevant because we're done? 821a487 > --> 826c492 < <small>$Revision: 1.21 $ of $Date: 2007/06/29 19:39:56 $</small> --- > <small>$Revision: 1.23 $ of $Date: 2007/06/29 20:52:32 $</small> -------------------------------------------- David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 21:11:59 UTC