- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:03:58 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 13:43 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> (DanC - here's my draft message to the HTML WG, please feel free to >> forward as this in your capacity as Chair of the HTML WG if you think >> it's appropriate.) >> > > Thanks for giving it a try, but... > > >> [...] Note that we are not formally dependent on the work >> of the HTML WG, so our request for review is informal and not required, >> but would be appreciated. >> > > If I was sure of that, I wouldn't have started this whole discussion. > That's why I forwarded the e-mail out for discussion. > Claiming it doesn't make it true. > > But we do *not* formally cite in the spec HTML. We only cite XHTML. Therefore, we do not have a formal normative dependency. If you think we have a dependency, that's fine - it's probably not normative, but it may be important. In which case, I hereby give you permission to delete that sentence and forward the e-mail to the WG. -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 21:04:04 UTC