- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 21:23:18 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 10:51 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: > >> While I understand Ivan's concerns, I think there is a large point and >> then two ramifications: >> >> We *should not* formally ask for reviews, >> > > Really? It's pretty clear to me that we should; indeed, that we did > when we went to last call and CR. > > My reasoning for formally asking for review would be that we have only so far formally asked for review from groups that mentioned such in our charter. >> but we should probably at >> least bring GRDDL to their attention. This should be done by e-mailing >> the chairs and telling them to forward the announcement that we are going to >> PR in July, and that while we are not formally requesting comments, now is >> the time to put in any last minute comments. >> > > I don't understand why you say "not formally requesting comments." > > If you're suggesting that a PR request that doesn't show review > by these WGs is complete, I'm not convinced. > Well, since you're the staff contact DanC, and if the reviews make the spec better, then I will send in the review request later tonight. I'm crossing-fingers though. >> 1) A review by (X)HTML should be uncontroversial. Therefore, I will >> e-mail their chair today to "bring it to his attention". >> >> 2) A review by HTML WG could be controversial. The main point of bringing >> GRDDL to their attention would be ask them to politely *not* remove >> profile, since other standards (i.e. GRDDL) use it. Therefore, I suggest >> that we carefully phrase an e-mail to the chair of the HTML WG saying to >> forward a message from the GRDDL Working Group that is about to go to PR >> and that uses "profile" attribute. Therefore, in any future arguments the >> HTML WG has, there will be some ammunition for those who want to keep the >> "profile" attribute in HTML. >> > > That seems like a reasonable thing to do; I'm not sure whether it's > enough, though. > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 01:23:41 UTC