procedural point about PR vote

I believe it would be wholly inappropriate to agree substantive changes 
at the next meeting, and then have a PR vote at the same meeting.

I believe that on the agenda we will have:
- addressing DBooth3
- approving additional tests
- Test Cases Doc
- Spec Doc
- PR Vote

So, in my view, deciding to address DBooth3 along the lines that David 
has suggested, would mean that the last item could not be considered at 
this meeting. I guess there won't be a meeting on July 4.

Jeremy

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 08:17:14 UTC