RE: 20 Jun 2007 GRDDL WG Minutes

Regarding my action:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Jun/att-0243/GRD
DL-WG_--_20_Jun_2007.html#item07
[[
ACTION: dbooth Send "just that sentence to be added to faithful infoset"
over the listserv
]]

That action is now moot and can be dropped. 

The additional sentence for the Faithful Renditions section (not
"faithful infoset") was to facilitate a future definition of "complete
GRDDL results", but I think it would take the WG too much time to
consider it, and I would rather the WG focus on the more critical part
of the ambiguity issue.  I intend to pursue the notion of "complete
GRDDL results" as a member submission instead.

Thanks

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent
the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
 

Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 19:15:04 UTC