- From: Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:13:35 +0100
- To: "Booth, David \(HP Software - Boston\)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "Murray Maloney" <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) [mailto:dbooth@hp.com] > > But as author of the original document, you are the one > choosing which > > GRDDL transformation should be associated with it. Why would you > > choose to associate a transformation so dependent on XInclude > > semantics when you have no control over the client > processing of the > > XML document that you are authoring? > > It is not a matter of associating the right transformation. I believe it is. GRDDL allows a document author to associate transformations with their document. It does not licence arbitrary transformations to be applied to any document. > The point is that the GRDDL transformation author may not > have control over the meaning of the XML document. True - that's not the goal of GRDDL. The document author has that control and will select an appropriate transformation. Ian -- Find out more about Talis at www.talis.com Shared InnovationTM Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited. Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
Received on Sunday, 17 June 2007 23:13:39 UTC