Re: Xinclude word-smithing

OK

Jeremy


Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:08 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> [...]
>> My understanding is the the GRDDL WG position is that GRDDL is neutral
>> with respect to such XML preprocessing, e.g. a GRDDL aware agent may
>> process an XPath nodeset before or after xinclude processing, and the
>> issue of whether to perform such processing is deferred to XProc WG and
>> to the TAG.
>>
>> To better reflect this, I suggest the sentence:
>>
>> "Whether or not processing of XInclude, XML Validity, XML Schema
>> Validity, XML Signatures or XML Decryption take place is
>> implementation-defined"
>>
>> be changed to
>>
>> "Whether or not processing of XInclude, XML Validity, XML Schema
>> Validity, XML Signatures or XML Decryption take place is as defined in
>> other recommendations and by implementation-specific behaviour"
> 
> I'm persuaded by your rationale, but I made a slightly different
> edit:
>  
> -<p>This specification is purposely silent on the question of which XML
> +<p>This specification is silent on the question of which XML
>  processors are employed by or for GRDDL-aware agents. Whether or not
>  processing of XInclude, XML Validity, XML Schema Validity, XML
>  Signatures or XML Decryption take place is
> -implementation-defined. There is no universal expectation that an XSLT
> +unspecified. There is no universal expectation that an XSLT
>  processor will call on such processing before executing a GRDDL
>  transformation.  Therefore, it is suggested that GRDDL transformations
>  be written so that they perform all expected pre-processing, including
> @@ -2317,6 +2317,11 @@
>  
>  <pre><!-- next line -->
>  $Log: spec.html,v $
> +Revision 1.263  2007/06/13 14:56:26  connolly
> +to reflect the postponed status of #issue-faithful-infoset,
> +take "purposely" out and change implementation-defined
> +to "unspecified"
> +
> 

-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 08:25:19 UTC