- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:03:45 -0400
- To: "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
- cc: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I've moved this thread to public-grddl-wg as it is more appropriate for your question. On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 08:57 -0400, Clark, John wrote: > I guess I didn't notice this because I've been generating a "fresh" > `grddl-tests.rdf` from `grddl-tests.html` using `aboutTests.xsl`. Why > do we keep `grddl-tests.rdf` under version control? Mostly for convenience and posterity (most other RDF-based test frameworks keep a test manifest in version control: SPARQL, RDF tests, etc.). It would seem unnecessarily recursive to require a GRDDL aware-agent running the tests to determine compliance to have to compute the test harness in the first place. -- Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org =================================== Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of our services, staff and locations. Confidentiality Note: This message is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 13:04:04 UTC