- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 10:17:40 +0200
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
(Source) XHTML documents served as "text/html" - may be treated as XML by a GRDDL-aware agent...? I can't remember if this has come up already, either way I couldn't see anywhere in the docs it was covered. I've a feeling trying to deal with it normatively in the text might be a rathole because RFC 3023 is a bit ratty. But perhaps a test case is in order? Although strictly speaking this seems to violate authoritative metadata, pragmatically it probably makes sense based on existing precedent (and use in the wild) - [[ XHTML Documents which follow the guidelines set forth in Appendix C, "HTML Compatibility Guidelines" may be labeled with the Internet Media Type "text/html" [RFC2854], as they are compatible with most HTML browsers. ]] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#media There are test cases nearby already: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/multipleRepresentations (note there's a typo in the <h1> of that doc) Maybe have that served as both "application/xhtml+xml" as well as "text/html"? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2007 08:17:44 UTC