N/As in implementation report

There are four groups of tests which involve n/a s.

the first two involve content negotiation:

=============
langconneg1 approved Pass Pass Pass
langconneg2 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass
langconneg3 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass

multipleRepresentations approved Pass Pass Pass
multipleRepresentations2 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass
multipleRepresentations3 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass
=============

For these two groups, the third system allows user configuration 
(simulated when running the tests) to choose different content 
negotiation parameters (including using TCN, language: de ...) whereas 
the other two systems use content negotiation parameters, that 
corresponds to the first test in each group.


The third group of tests depends on whether xinclude expansion is 
enabled or not.
The third system has this as a user-configurable option, whereas the 
first and the second always expand xincludes.

==========
noxinclude approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass
xinclude approved Pass Pass Pass
==========


The last group of tests considers a corner case document whose GRDDL 
result gives rise to more GRDDL results. The tests are designed to show 
that this isn't a good idea because different systems may give different 
results, depending on how many times they process the same document.

As the test doc says:
[[
Documents authors are advised against having information resources whose 
GRDDL results depend on other GRDDL results for the same resource.
]]

=========
loopx approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
loopx1 approved Pass Pass Not Applicable
loopx2 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Pass
loopx3 approved Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
========


Jeremy



-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2007 16:41:44 UTC