W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > August 2007


From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:59:59 +0200
Message-Id: <0700DA21-DB15-4655-A2E1-990B5B7BC89E@bblfish.net>
Cc: Ayers Danny <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Powell David <djpowell@djpowell.net>, Beckett Dave <dave@dajobe.org>
To: "KANZAKI, Masahide" <webmaster@kanzaki.cc>, GRDDL Group Working <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

On 23 Aug 2007, at 04:21, KANZAKI, Masahide wrote:
> (at Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:57:49 +0200 by henry.story@bblfish.net)
>> A quick look at Masahide's ontology, and I would guess that he will
>> have a problem with
>> atom feeds with multiple entries with the same id. Since I don't
>> think those map well to
>> RSS...
> You mean those will end up with multiple <rss:item> with same  
> rdf:about
> values ?  Well, that's not valid in RSS 1.0 but no problem as RDF.  
> This
> transformation disguises RSS 1.0, but not true one ;-)

It may be ok RDF, but the RDF will not mean what people expect it to  
mean. Your RSS Item will once smushed have two titles, two updated  
time stampes, two contents, etc.. You will not be able to tell which  
content belonged to which title, nor which was published at which time.

Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 10:00:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:39 UTC