- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:28:04 +0100
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org
- CC: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Copied from WG list, should also have been on the comments list. Dave Beckett's comments preceded by >> WG responce preceded by > Harry Halpin wrote: > Sent on behalf of the WG, text by member Jeremy Carroll: > Hi Dave > >> Are the contents you get when resolving the URI >> http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view part of the GRDDL recommendation? > >> If so, I'd expect the contents to be static and could be hard-coded >> into applications. If not static, what are the expected changes? >> (Given that above the only allowed changes are defined to not affect >> GRDDL processing). > >> The GRDDL profile URI is a significant URI for the GRDDL >> specification, so this is why I want to check if there is >> anything special going on with it's use and any contents >> that it may contain. > > > To reply directly: > a) No, the content of http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view are not part > of the GRDDL recommendation? > b) We will review and correct the contents of > http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view during the candidate recommendation > phase (which we hope will be from May 1st to June 1st), after which it > should be stable. We will update you when we have done this. > c) Applications can behave as if the file had an empty GRDDL result, > except when they are explicitly asked for the GRDDL result of this > resource. In the latter case, they should do a GET on the URI and apply > the usually GRDDL mechanisms. > > This is the force of the statement in the editor's draft: > [[ > The namespace document includes RDF data about the terms in the GRDDL > Vocuabulary, but these RDF data do not include any triples whose > predicate is grddl:profileTransformation. > ]] > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab > > since that is the only type of triple that one would normally have to > look for. > > Does this adequately address your concerns about the namespace document? > > =========== > > Jeremy > -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 11:29:38 UTC