draft to respond to one of Dave Beckett's msgs

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-comments/2007AprJun/0008


I suggest either Dan or Harry sends this soon (like today)
==

Hi Dave

 >  Are the contents you get when resolving the URI
 >  http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view part of the GRDDL recommendation?

 > If so, I'd expect the contents to be static and could be hard-coded
 > into applications.  If not static, what are the expected changes?
 > (Given that above the only allowed changes are defined to not affect
 > GRDDL processing).

 > The GRDDL profile URI is a significant URI for the GRDDL
 > specification, so this is why I want to check if there is
 > anything special going on with it's use and any contents
 > that it may contain.


To reply directly:
a) No, the content of  http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view are not part 
of the GRDDL recommendation?
b) We will review and correct the contents of 
http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view during the candidate recommendation 
phase (which we hope will be from May 1st to June 1st), after which it 
should be stable. We will update you when we have done this.
c) Applications can behave as if the file had an empty GRDDL result, 
except when they are explicitly asked for the GRDDL result of this 
resource. In the latter case, they should do a GET on the URI and apply 
the usually GRDDL mechanisms.

This is the force of the statement in the editor's draft:
[[
The namespace document includes RDF data about the terms in the GRDDL 
Vocuabulary, but these RDF data do not include any triples whose 
predicate is grddl:profileTransformation.
]]
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab

since that is the only type of triple that one would normally have to 
look for.

Does this adequately address your concerns about the namespace document?

===========

Jeremy





-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:46:51 UTC