- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 09:52:55 -0500
- To: ogbujic@ccf.org
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:26 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: [...] > Define a class xhtml:Document defined (necessarily and sufficiently) as > the class of documents which have a jc:validWRT relationship between > them and a W3C sanctioned XHTML DTD That excludes the input document in the test case currently in question. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/html-and-grddl-xform-attr jjc objects to that objection, with good reason. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0129.html And actually, DTDs funamentally don't fit the jc:validWRT model. xml:valid(doc) is a one-place predicate, and it's only true when doc includes (by value or by reference) a DTD. It would be really nice if XML 1.0 had defined a valid(doc, DTD) relationship, but it didn't. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 14:53:00 UTC