- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:19:48 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I'm happy to see LC of TC, and I trust everyone working on it enough that I am willing to attempt consensus on LC at our telecon tomorrow - the agenda will be out shortly. I have updated the Primer (although it needs lots of link fixing and example checking, which I will try to get to today). I'll be neutral on it - the TC are clearly more important. I will also get a CR transition draft out for GRDDL Spec and e-mail to list. Thanks for all the hard work! Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > Hi Harry > > I am expecting to be able to formally propose moving the test cases to > LC and the spec to CR, but not before the agenda deadline. > > The proposals will have the form > > Propose publishing LC of TC subject to: > - a > - b > - c > > But I haven't worked out a, b and c yet. > > Note that while these two are related, it is possible to publish LC of > Test Cases, without moving the spec to CR (which is procedurally more > difficult). Hence it may be most effective to decide on the test cases > prior to deciding on the spec. Hmmm... I guess I would structure the > agenda: > > - issues against spec > - test approvals > - test cases for LC > - other issues considering CR > + lc comments > + other process issues > - spec for CR > > also depends on the current state of the primer. > Personally, I am currently inclined to oppose LC on the primer, should > anyone care to propose it. > > Jeremy > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 18:19:55 UTC