Re: GRDDL RDFa transformation tests results

Chimezie Ogbuji:
> Hello Fabien.  I was working on a general purpose RDFa -> RDF/XML
> modality for an Atom feed over the weekend and used this transformation
> stylesheet (or the one in the GRDDL WG repository:
> grddl-wg/td/RDFa2RDFXML_v_0_7.xsl). I had to make some changes to get it
> to work and thought you might be interested.  I didn't commit the
> changes, below is a diff:
Thanks, please do commit them (I can't) ; I changed the online version here:
http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/RDFa2RDFXML_v_0_7.xsl
> I also wondered if the lack of support for blank node CURIES (i.e.,
> [_:a]) was because this is an 'unstable' feature in RDFa?
>   
Well no... this really is due to a lack of time: there is a stable 
section explaining this aspect of the syntax in the specs but to 
implement it properly I need to rewrite some of the core templates of 
the transformation to be able to switch from "rdf:about" or 
"rdf:resource" to "rdf:nodeID" when I generate triples attached to blank 
nodes. The current transforms gives generated rdf:IDs to blank nodes and 
this is a bad hack I should remove as soon as I have the time to do it ; 
then I will be able to address blank node CURIES properly.
>> Question #2: What happened to the use of "class" attribute?
>> Since I found no trace of it in the tests and in the syntax, I
>> deactivated its use in the transformation.
>>     
> Yes, I was going to ask about this as well, but I notice there is an
> ongoing discussion about it in public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org :)
Yes and as of today there is nothing about this in the RDFa syntax specs 
that's while I removed the templates I had for it.

Cheers,

-- 
Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/