- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:35:44 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 14:29 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Here are some suggestions concerning the @@'s in editor's draft. > $Date: 2007/04/18 14:54:08 $ > $Revision: 1.250 $ > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec Thanks; I these helped a lot with my TODO list. I think this suggestion, which I followed, is particularly worth noting: > @@cite GRDDL test cases? > ============== > > Yes, as a normative ref. With the following text linking to it. > > Under > Preface and Companion Documents > > add > [[ > <h4 id="intro_testcases">GRDDL Test Cases</h4> > > <p>The GRDDL Test Cases<a class="norm" href="#testcases">[testcases]</a> > provides a collection of tests illustrating this specification. > Some of the tests may help clarify the intended > reading of the normative text.</p> > ]] A normative citation on the test cases blows away the possibility of doing a CR on the spec while the test cases are in last call. (I discovered this while trying to update the detailed schedule http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/sched7 ). But it seems like The Right Thing. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 05:35:45 UTC