- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:48:14 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 14:13 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > A modification to my previous suggested text > > [[ > While these mechanisms are intended primarily > for valid XHTML family documents, they also > may be used with invalid XHTML family documents, > particularly those that would be valid > upon deletion of all namespace qualified attributes. > ]] What do you mean by "invalid XHTML family documents"? There is no such thing, as far as I know. All the current XHTML specs use DTDs to say what an XHTML document is, I think. > > Jeremy > > Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > I suggest, at the end of section 4, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-grddl-20070302/#grddl-xhtml > > immediately before the section 5 heading, the following informative > > paragraph, clarifying the scope of the previous two normative statements. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 23 April 2007 15:48:17 UTC