- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:19:43 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I should have included an executive summary for those who were not present - this is based on what I've told my colleagues: === GRDDL will not be going to PR before WWW 2007. The current, optimistic, plan is to vote next week on: - moving GRDDL spec to CR - moving GRDDL test cases to LC - if GRDDL primer is ready for LC then we will vote on that, otherwise it will not be Rec tracked. We agreed (lower case a) that the documents needed for the vote would need to be ready 24hrs before the meeting. === We had a long discussion about base URIs yesterday. To summarize: - GRDDL has never said anything about base URIs except, "do what the other specs say" - GRDDL implementations have not done what the other specs say, so we need a few more test cases to catch these cases - the GRDDL library (two functions) has not done what the other specs say, so that needs to be fixed (current maintainer: me) - the GRDDL spec lacks a normative reference to XML Base, and needs one, and needs to clearer about its dependency on HTML base element, and the section of RFC 3986 dealing with redirects. Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2007 09:19:56 UTC