RE: GRDDL RDFa transformation tests results

Fabien, 

Thank you _very_ much. Great job! We (Wing and I) are certainly
going to work through it and address all of the open issues.
Please allow us some time to elaborate on this ...

The JUnit test suite sounds very interesting - any chances we can
use it on a public basis?

If appropriate, may we include your three new TC into the official
suite?

Regarding the XMLLiteral issue (TC 13): 
Did you have a look at [1], already? If yes, feel free to add an
according 
question (best with source code :) there, if not, pls have a look at
this
Wiki page, and tell us if it answers your question or what is still
missing.

Now, trying to answer some of your questions:

>Question #1: Where do I get the URL of the source document from?
>The current stylesheet tests if there is a xml:base. If there 
>is no xml:base it tests if the parameter URL was past to it. 
>If not the default value is "".

IMHO this is correct, looking at [2] and [3] (resolved issues).

>Question #2: What happened to the use of "class" attribute?
>Since I found no trace of it in the tests and in the syntax, I 
>deactivated its use in the transformation.

Hm. IIRC, this is still in flux, see Tracker [4]. 
We certainly have to resolve this one; the latest thread on
the RDFa list I am aware of is [5].

@Ben: I've just updated the Tracker issue 3, maybe an agenda item for
today?

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/syntax/#IDAV0EFC
[3]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current-issues.html#cu
rie-base
[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/3
[5]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007Feb/0063.
html

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
  
 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
----------------------------------------------------------
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fabien Gandon [mailto:Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr] 
>Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 7:53 PM
>To: Hausenblas, Michael
>Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org; public-grddl-wg; Dan 
>Connolly; Harry Halpin
>Subject: GRDDL RDFa transformation tests results
>
>Hello,
>
>I had a look at the test cases and here is a summary of what 
>I've done this week-end:
>- I released v0.7 of the transformation stylesheet:
>http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/sweetwiki.html
>
>- I built a JUnit test suite to automate the test of the 
>output of the transformation using the SPARQL engine CORESE 
>http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/soft/corese/
>
>- I added 3 tests to the current collection (multiple rel / 
>property predicates and rel with no href):
>http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grdd
l/rdfatests/
>
>- Among the 32 tests I pass all of them but 5 : I fail 1 of 
>them, I think 4 of them have mistakes and 1 succeeds but I am 
>not sure I like what it does. Results of GRDDL transformations 
>and SPARQL queries are available here:
>http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grdd
l/rdfatests/results_2007_04_15/
>
>Details below,
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
>Details:
>
>Question #1: Where do I get the URL of the source document from?
>The current stylesheet tests if there is a xml:base. If there 
>is no xml:base it tests if the parameter URL was past to it. 
>If not the default value is "".
>
>
>Question #2: What happened to the use of "class" attribute?
>Since I found no trace of it in the tests and in the syntax, I 
>deactivated its use in the transformation.
>
>
>Question #3: What should I do with non qualified predicates?
>Ex: <link rel="transformation" 
>href="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/glean-hcal" 
><http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/glean-hcal> />
>
>
>Test case#11: I think the SPARQL query is not in the right direction.
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000011.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000011.sparql
>
>The RDFa says (note that it uses "rev" and not "rel")
><link about="http://example.org/Person1" <http://example.org/Person1> 
>          rev="foaf:knows" href="http://example.org/Person2" 
><http://example.org/Person2>  /> 
>
>While the query says:
><http://example.org/Person1> <http://example.org/Person1>  
><http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows> 
><http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows>  
><http://example.org/Person2> <http://example.org/Person2> 
>
>Even if foaf:knows was transitive, I think it wouldn't be a 
>good idea to rely on this in an RDFa test.
>
>
>Test case#13: I fail this test but I need explanations.
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000013.sparql
>Here I don't really know what to produce: the reason I fail is 
>because when I copy the source nodes:
>E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time
>The transformation adds the namespaces declaration to <sup>.
>I am not clear exactly what should be copied: (1) the exact 
>string or (2) the XML nodes and their context?
>I looked at the following pointer but couldn't tell after either:
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-concepts-20030123/#dfn-rdf-XMLLiteral
>
>
>Test case#102: the SPARQL query contains "malto:libby" instead 
>of "mailto:libby" <mailto:libby> .
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000102.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000102.sparql
>
>
>Test case#105: the SPARQL query contains "000105.ttl#photo1" 
>instead of "000105.html#photo1".
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000105.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000105.sparql
>
>
>Test case#108: the SPARQL query contains several 
>"000108.ttl#me" instead of "000108.html#me".
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000108.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000108.sparql
>
>
>Test case#112: Although I pass this one I am not sure it is 
>right to use datatype like this.
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000112.html
>http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/testcases/000112.sparql
>This one uses a fake datatype which implies hacking in the 
>code and I am not sure it is a good idea. Why not use 
>rdf:Literal for the same result?
><span about="http://example.org/node" 
><http://example.org/node>  property="ex:property" xml:lang=" 
><xml:lang=> fr" datatype="plainliteral">chat</span>
>
>
>
>
>Hausenblas, Michael: 
>
>	Fabien,
>	
>	Ok, great. Let us go through it step by step.
>	
>	First, my action [1] (in the RDFa TF) was about
>	updating your XSLT to reflect the latest updates,
>	for example [2].
>	
>	Regarding the URL for the GRDDL profile, I'd like propose
>	to take Dan's comment [3] into account.
>	
>	I'm in doubt if it makes sense that I actually start making
>	the updates, as you already have planed to do it ...
>	
>	Regarding the test cases: The RDFa Test Suite is available
>	at [4] and we would be very happy if people start using it and
>	give feedback ;)
>	
>	IMHO it would be a good idea, if you could join us at next 
>	Monday's RDFa telecon. We could sort out these issues -
>	also w.r.t. overlaps in the GRDDL/RDFa - and agree on a 
>	further road map.
>	
>	Now, what do you think?
>	
>	Cheers,
>		Michael
>	
>	[1] http://www.w3.org/2007/04/11-rdfa-minutes.html#action12 
>	[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject
>	[3]
>	
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007
Apr/0027.
>	html
>	[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/
>	
>	----------------------------------------------------------
>	 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>	 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>	 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>	 
>	 http://www.joanneum.at/iis/
>	----------------------------------------------------------
>	
>	
>	  
>
>		-----Original Message-----
>		From: Fabien Gandon 
>[mailto:Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr]
>		Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 10:29 AM
>		To: Hausenblas, Michael
>		Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org; public-grddl-wg; Dan
>		Connolly; Harry Halpin
>		Subject: Re: Comments on RDFa Syntax version 
>1.8 2007/04/06 16:36:34
>		
>		Hausenblas, Michael:
>		
>		
>		      Fabien,
>		       
>		
>		              I hope to get time to update the 
>RDFa2RDFXML
>		transformation [2] to
>		              reflect latest changes.
>		                 
>		
>		      What a coincidence! I got an action on 
>exactly this one -
>		      we may want to jointly do that?
>		      This also goes along with setting up an 
>official GRDDL
>		profile for RDFa.
>		       
>		
>		
>		Hi Michael,
>		
>		I didn't know there was an action on this and now that I
>		finished the GRDDL use case note, I intend to 
>update the RDFa
>		transformation again. In fact this is the 6th 
>version of the
>		RDFa2RDFXML stylesheet and here is what I had 
>on my "to do list":
>		1 - INRIA accepted to set up a permanent domain name and
>		server to publish resources with stable durable 
>URL. As soon
>		as it is running I intend to use it to publish 
>a profile and a
>		transform with stable URL.
>		2 - The last version of the transform addresses 
>a number of
>		features (e.g. CURIEs) but a number of cases 
>are still not
>		addressed yet (e.g. multiple values in "rel" attribute).
>		3 - There is also a need to produce a test 
>suite to validate
>		the transformation. For the time being I use a 
>file compiling
>		some of the examples of the primer but the 
>tests need to be
>		complete w.r.t. last specs.
>		4 - There is a need to update the GRDDL+RDFa 
>primer I started
>		a while ago and which is out of date now ; see 
>		
>http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grdd
>		    
>
>	l/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html
>	  
>
>		Cheers,
>		
>		--
>		Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/
>		
>		    
>
>	
>	  
>
>
>-- 
>Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/
>

Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 08:57:44 UTC