- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:52:01 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:32 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> Second attempt:
[...]
> Hmmmm,
> I think that's better than the earlier essay!
yes, much.
done in http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#txforms 1.247
[[
Document authors, particularly XHTML document authors, who wish their
documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL should avoid
dependencies on an external DTD subset (see section 2.8 of [XML]);
specifically:
* Explicitly include the XHTML namespace declaration in an XHTML
document, or an appropriate namespace in an XML document.
* Avoid use of entity references, except those listed in section
4.6 of [XML]
* And, more generally, follow the rules listed for the standalone
document validity constraint.
]]
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 04:52:43 UTC