- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:31:57 +0200
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- CC: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, all your remarks and a new diagram have been included, see v1.36 of http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm Chimezie Ogbuji a écrit : > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Fabien Gandon wrote: >>> I think it's good to include the diagrams (ditto for Primer), though 2 >>> of them I found not-so helpful (Wikis and e-learning; XForms-based >>> Webapps). >> Could you give us hints as to what could be done to improve them? > > I recently sent [1] a diagram for the XForms-based Webapps usecase > that *might* be a bit more clear. > >>> There's good justification in the paragraphs that follow for throwing >>> out their XML representation altogether and just using RDF. The >>> primary justification (offered by 4Suite) seems to be getting the >>> utility of RDF and XML tools. Perhaps the benefits of the XML side >>> could be reiterated? >> Chimezie: do you have a suggestion here? > > Yes, I had specific clarifications [2] for this part: > > How about (right after .. being able to query both as XML and as RDF): > > "The corresponding XML documents can be transformed into 'other' XML > dialects, evaluated by XPath & XPointer expressions, cross-linked by > XLink > or XInclude, and structurally validated by RELAX NG (or XML Schema)." > >>> "...every site he should federate with." - better word than "federate" >>> (it's not clear what's intended until a few lines down). >> I am probably not the best person to suggest a word but what about >> "syndicate"? > > In the same email I also suggested syndicate as well as 'subscribe to': > > '.. that he doesn't want to surf the net to find sites he might want > to subscribe to ..'? or 'he might want to syndicate' > >>> I've heard reservations of the use of "endpoint" - ok here? >> I am not qualified to answer this. Anyone has an opinion? > > How about service address? > >>> There are a few other terms that should probably go in the glossary : >>> microformats, RDFa, SPARQL...(I'll see if I have time ;-) >> Well, the document includes links linking to specs or docs for all >> these terms but if you insist... ;-) > > I wonder if linking to their specifications is sufficient than to add > them to the glossary (which I'd assume is specific to the topic of > GRDDL). > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/0148.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Sep/0147.html > > Chimezie Ogbuji > Lead Systems Analyst > Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery > Cleveland Clinic Foundation > 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 > Cleveland, Ohio 44195 > Office: (216)444-8593 > ogbujic@ccf.org > > -- "To the man who only has a hammer in the toolkit, every problem looks like a nail." -- Abraham Maslow. ____________ |__ _ |_ http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/ | (_||_) INRIA Sophia Antipolis - ph# (33)(0)4 92 38 77 88
Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 09:32:30 UTC