- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 08:16:24 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 07:57 -0400, Harry Halpin wrote: > GRDDL Processor is defined here: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm#GRDDLProcessor > > I thought we wanted to use consistent vocabulary in the spec, the > use-cases, and the primer, therefore my use of the word "GRDDL Processor." I think the glossary in the primer is good for for consistent advocacy, but I don't think we should try to make them into conformance labels. For one thing, the definitions are circular: GRDDL processor is defined in terms of GRDDL source document, which in turn is defined in terms of GRDDL processor. That's fine for an informative glossary, but it doesn't work as a specification. The spec currently has no normative dependency on the primer, and I think that's as it should be. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2006 13:17:14 UTC