- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:29:53 -0500
- To: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
In http://research.talis.com/2006/grddl-wg/primer.html 5758 2006-09-12 22:36:30Z I see "In this section use case #3 is used to explain more fully the role of GRDDL in aggregating data from a variety of different sources." I strongly suggest changing that to In this section, the guitar review use case is used to explain... And in scenario-gallery.htm, I suggest phasing out the "use_case_3" anchor in favor of "use_case_guitar" or some such. Other options include (a) leave the anchors as is, even if the numbers in the section headings change (b) make a WG decision that these are the use cases, and that while we might add more on the end, we'll never change the order. This doesn't guarantee that we'll never change our mind, but it acknowledges the hassle of doing so. (c) add new anchors while keeping the old ones around, a la: <h2 id="use_case_synreview">Use case <span id="use_case_3">#3</a> - Aggregating data: Stephan wants a synthetic review before buying a guitar.</h2> see also... "Be careful not to break links in revisions. If your document uses latest version URIs with a fragment identifier, unless those anchors are maintained across versions, links will break." -- W3C Manual of Style, section 8. Revisions http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Revisions -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 22:31:49 UTC