- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 01:58:54 +0100
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Note this is just me discharging my duty, and the WG has still has consensus that the spec. does not *need* changing. However, I think in the interests of clarity after this sentence: "While javascript, C, or any other programming language technically expresses the relevant information, XSLT is specifically designed to express XML to XML transformations and has some good safety characteristics." There should be this sentence: "GRDDL processors SHOULD support XSLT 1.0 and MAY support other transformation languages." That's all folks. -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Friday, 8 September 2006 00:59:17 UTC