- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:58:56 -0500
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 16:20 +0100, McBride, Brian wrote: [...] > > I'd like someone to give this out-of-band transformation > > stuff a separate name, since it's clearly not useful to > > pretend the issue doesn't exist. > > I used to call it "3rd party transformations", I think. To be more clear, I'd like more than a name/phrase. I'd like to see a design document and a few test cases passed by multiple implementations. I'm sympathetic to expanding the scope of our use cases document to cover the 3rd party case, but until there is a design document and running code and test cases, I want to set very low expectations about whether GRDDL will handle those cases. Perhaps a "future work" or "related work" section. Another option is an ESW Wiki topic in the Grddl category. http://esw.w3.org/topic/CategoryGrddl Even if/when the design/test/implementation details of the 3rd party case are worked out, I much prefer to keep the name GRDDL for the follow-your-nose cases and not mix it up with the 3rd-party case. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2006 15:59:26 UTC