W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: hope to hear from you today about the GRDDL spec

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:39:26 -0500
To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161409166.32588.34.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:03 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 14:38 -0400, Ben Adida wrote:
> > Dan Connolly wrote:
> > > I think you missed a subtlety.
> > > Any GRDDL result of ?NSDOC is a result of ?D by the 1st bullet.
> > 
> > So this means that you can declare a namespaceTransformation in the
> > instance document? I guess that doesn't hurt, but it's fairly confusing.
> > I'm not sure what the value of this generalized formalization is.
> I think there's a reason, but I'm not sure I remember it.
> I was in quite a fugue when I came up with this formulation,
> and I'm not sure I can return to that state this week.
> I hope I can explain it in due course.

On second thought, I think you're right. But I'm not
sure yet, so I'm not going to change it just now.

> Meanwhile, as you say, the current draft specification
> doesn't hurt.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2006 05:39:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:34 UTC