- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:14:12 -0500
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 11:17 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote: > I am not so sure that it needs to move. I would like to hear from the > masses. > At 03:13 PM 10/20/2006 +0100, Ian Davis wrote: [...] > > I agree it should be in the primer but I won't have time to do that > > before the target spec pub date. I also don't want to be on the > > critical path. Can you alter the text to say something more direct > > such as "This section will be moved to the primer in the next > > version"? Thanks for the advice. I moved the editorial note to the end of the subsection, and made another one just like it at the end of the next subsection. "The Working Group is likely to add a section to the GRDDL primer much like this subsection. Since this subsection has no novel normative material, we're interested in feedback on whether it should remain part of this specification once it is covered by the primer." -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.124 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 17:14:20 UTC