- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:35:26 -0500
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:51 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > I've had a chance to ponder this issue. In the end I think the > language is fine as it is. Ah. Good. At least for now. Can I take this as your thumbs-up of the document overall? i.e. you're out of the critical path for publication in the sense of the decision we made? "PROPOSED: to publish 24 Oct http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.120 + edits by DanC, contingent on editor (DanC) satisfying comments to come from BenA, Chime, Rachael ... so RESOLVED." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Oct/att-0052/18-grddl-wg-minutes.html#item04 > In particular, [... lots of interesting details which I hope to return to once I get this spec released...] -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 13:35:37 UTC