- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 09:59:05 -0500
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 21:16 +0100, Harry Halpin wrote:
> Apologies for my moment of incoherence. Let me rephrase the issue I'm
> trying to get at
I'm not inclined to make any of the suggested spec changes at
this point.
I think it's critical that we develop test cases for the
cases noted in the issue...
http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns
* how a GRDDL client interacts with a document whose root element
is an XSLT literal result element
* how a GRDDL client interacts with an RDF document that has a
root element other than rdf:RDF.
* whether RDF/XML statements labelled as application/xml
constitute a "document whose meaning includes the RDF
statement ..."
* what happens if data-view:transformation is given on an rdf:RDF
root element
In the course of working out the details of those test cases,
it will either become clear that the spec should change or that
it should stay as is.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 14:59:12 UTC