- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 17:18:59 +0100
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
I'm just going to sort of do an exegesis of Murray's proposal [1], which I *think* can be summarized as "A GRDDL transformation applies to the document as received by the client from the server with no additional processing assumed to be done. " Then maybe to clear things up: "If additional processing needs to be done in order to extract valid RDF, it should be done either by the server before it sends the document to the server or as the processing should be included in the GRDDL transform itself." Adding sentences to those effect in the Spec would be useful, maybe with one of the following examples: This means a GRDDL transformation would *not* use XInclude to include items before running a GRDDL transform, or if the document itself contained XSLT elements it would *not* run that XSLT and then run the GRDDL transform, but would just run the GRDDL transform. If you wanted the include via XInclude items or run another XSLT transformation before running GRDDL, you would use some sort of pipeline language like XMLProc as your GRDDL Transformation [2]. There used to be some issues, originally brought up by Brian McBride I believe, that dealt with whether or not XIncludes should resovled, if XSLT code in the source document should be run before GRDDL, and the such but I can't find them [3] except for issues involving RDF as a namespace document [4], which I don't think Murray's suggestion applies to. [1]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/06-grddl-wg-minutes [2]http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/ [3]http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#issue-mt-ns [4]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Mar/0011.html cheers, harry -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 21:19:20 UTC