- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:20:52 +0100
- To: "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
- Cc: "Murray Maloney" <murray@muzmo.com>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
PS. On 28/12/06, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: > Incidentally, I'm not entirely sure why we would want the constraint > that the RDF rendition should only be an RDF representation of the > intended meaning of the source document in its native form. A WebArch-better way of putting this: that the GRDDL result is an alternate representation of the resource represented by the source document. On reflection it does seem neater if it is, and I don't think it negates the possibility of including material *about* the original representation which doesn't appear in that doc (such as a CC license). But this might not be consistent with Faithful Rendition as it appears in the current draft. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Thursday, 28 December 2006 14:27:23 UTC