RE: XPROC and the XINCLUDE issue

 
> This looks like a reasonable test (please do check it in)

I'm not familiar with how yet.  Do I have CVS or other access.  Is there
a test manifest somewhere.

> but 
> I don't see any mention of XInclude nor XProc in it. Is that 
> by design?

Yes.  This first test case was just to establish that there is a 'lower
bound' to the GRDDL results of a transform and that is the GRDDL result
applied to the infoset that is the result of simple parsing of the input
XML document.

I think this test case does this.  

BTW, I'm on leave till 8th Jan 2007.

Brian

> 
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
> D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
> 
> 

Received on Thursday, 21 December 2006 07:27:41 UTC