- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:02:21 -0600
- To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 10:28 -0500, Murray Maloney wrote: > ================================================================== > Stepping out of Devil's Advocate role for a moment... > > I think that the GRDDL spec should become clear that the source document > infoset > must reflect any declared DTD or schema, and must exercise XInclude. Anything > less abrogates the Faithful Rendition promise and is a failure. Hmm... argument by assertion. I'm not convinced. It seems to me necessary and sufficient to design GRDDL so that it has no specific mention of XInclude at all. The source document infoset is what you get by parsing the bytes that come over the wire. > My xi namespace proposal is at best a stop-gap measure aimed at mitigating > the impact > of such failure. > =================================================================== -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 15:02:37 UTC