- From: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:44:30 -0500 (EST)
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Ian Davis wrote: > There is an unbounded set of operations that could be applied to the > source document before any GRDDL transformation which complicates > matters as things stand. Xinclude is one operation, but DTD validation > is another. Do we expect every GRDDL processor to validate the source > document before application of the transform? I think the argument for XInclude resolution holds for any other set of XML operations: the author cannot guarantee which subset of these operations happen and in what order without an explicit pipleine and it would be in his/her best interest to use a pipleline in order to guarantee a 'faithful rendition' in such a scenario (which is very much dependent on the final XML infoset that the GRDDL transformation starts with). Chimezie Ogbuji Lead Systems Analyst Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Cleveland Clinic Foundation 9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26 Cleveland, Ohio 44195 Office: (216)444-8593 ogbujic@ccf.org
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 23:44:46 UTC