- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:15:39 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org, Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
On Dec 16, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Ben Adida wrote: > [...] > Murray, > > Yes, I agree that that is the appropriate output. But I have to point > out that this WG ruled out of scope the "hGRDDL transformation" > proposal > I made at the very beginning. I think that's overstating the situation a bit. I don't think this WG made any decisions about hGRDDL. (All our decisions are in our meeting minutes; if I'm forgetting one, a pointer will refute my claim conclusively.) > Here's what I wanted to see: > > 1) an RDFa-aware browser sees the profile and locates the corresponding > HTML->HTML+RDFa transformation, GRDDL style. > > 2) the transformation is performed inline on the DOM of the page, > yielding proper HTML+RDFa with appropriately updated RELs and CLASSes > that were specified by the profile transformations. This transformed > HTML can be rendered normally. > > 3) the updated, rendered page can be parsed using the normal RDFa, > yielding RDF attached to their corresponding DOM nodes. > > This also enables microformats to be transformed to RDFa, which is > fantastic for all involved. > > The big issue to resolve is (1). How do I request the appropriate > HTML->HTML+RDFa transformation? Just use the normal GRDDL markup, just like the Atom/turtle test case and our decision on issue-output-formats shows. An RDFa document is a serialization of an RDF graph just like a turtle document is, no? > Is there some content negotiation, or > some other clever trick, to determine which transformation I want to > use? How do I handle the case of multiple profiles? One after the > other? > In which order? Is that stuff really not specified to your satisfaction? > So yeah, in theory I agree, but with these issues judged out of scope, > the RDFa group is stuck trying to figure out how to make this happen. > With GRDDL, we can certainly take it straight from HTML to RDF, but > then > we lose the rendered-HTML/RDF correspondence that RDFa strives to > maintain. > > -Ben -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 17 December 2006 02:15:58 UTC