- From: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:21:26 -0500
- To: <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
At 09:38 AM 12/14/2006 +0000, Ian Davis wrote: > > Yes, clearly this should be fixed to something that makes > > *some* sense, like http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#transformation. > >Yes, although it would be nicer to have > >http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#transformation > >Although I don't see how this is generally possible, especially if there >were multiple profile URIs in the document. There is no way on earth that the former URI can be taken to be correct. The GRDDL URI is the only profile that is applicable, and there is nothing to tie the rel value to the HTML namespace because "transformation" is not a known value in the xhtml specification of the rel attribute. If there are multiple profiles, you have to examine each URI to determine in which profile (if any) there exists "transformation" as a name. If there are multiple applicable profiles, then you have to examine the value spaces to determine which is/are the most likely profile(s). IMHO. Murray
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 14:22:37 UTC