- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:42:15 -0500
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Ben Adida wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: >> The RDFa spec seems to turn the relationship into an RDF property >> named >> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmltransformation > > Ah yes, the darn no # or / issue. > > Yes, clearly this should be fixed to something that makes *some* sense, > like http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#transformation. Yes, that would be better, I suppose, though the HTML 4 spec is reasonably clear that when a link relationship is dominated by a profile, the profile is what grounds the link relationship in URI space, and the link relationship isn't defined by HTML. > This is on our issue list, btw: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-current- > issues#xhtml1-namespace Ah. good. > Btw, is rel=transformation a reserved value? Or is it defined by the > specific GRDDL profile in <HEAD>? The latter; it's defined by the GRDDL profile. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2006 05:42:24 UTC