- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 04:45:28 +0100
- To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
I was recently talking to Murray Maloney when discussing GRDDL informally that for some of our more complex use cases (using multiple arguments with GRDDL, BenA's case of multiple chained transformations) that we might want to liason with the XML Processing Model Group Working Group, as they are encountering many of the same issues when transforming XML->XML. What do people think? More importantly, how wedded are we to use-cases that require these sort of things? GRDDL as it stands now is a single transformation (usually XSLT) applied to a single HTML file that returns RDF. However, a number of use cases have been brought up, albeit informally, that wish to expand upon this. How serious are we? My opinion is that if there is clearly demonstrated need for such use case and they can be implemented in a consistent and elegant manner, I am fine with them. Yet complexity for the sake of complexity without concrete use cases is a bad thing :) -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Tuesday, 15 August 2006 03:45:39 UTC