- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:08:23 -0500
- To: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: public-grddl-wg@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 22:47 +0200, Fabien Gandon wrote: > Hi, > I am reading the GRDDL Data Views: Getting Started, Learning More [1] > and after the sentence "Reference the GRDDL profile to make it clear > what that transformation link type means" I wondered: what if a page is > using several profiles and transformations? Then all the profiles apply, and as an author, you'd better be sure that you're happy with the implications. > What I mean is if my pages uses both hDoap and DC and I write something > like: > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> > <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view" > profile="http://purl.org/stuff/hdoap/profile" > It's syntax error at the XML level to have 2 profile attributes; instead, write: <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view http://purl.org/stuff/hdoap/profile" > > <link rel="transformation" > href="http://www.w3.org/2000/06/dc-extract/dc-extract.xsl" /> > <link rel="transformation" > href="http://www.w3.org/2000/06/hdoap-extract/hdoap-extract.xsl" /> > … > </head> > … > </html> > > then we don't know which "profile" is associated to which "transformation". Both profiles are associated with the whole document. By the way... I think the link to hdoap-extract.xsl is redundant; it's implied by the use of the hdoap profile. > or did I miss something? > > Fabien. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 21:08:36 UTC