This notion appeals very much in principle, but I'm a little unsure of how it might work and/or provide benefits in practice, essentially due to the possibility of more convoluted operations than xml -xslt-> rdf These may be foolish questions, so kindly consider me Devil's Duty Solicitor - How does one know one has the complete GRDDL results? >From a producer's point of view it should be relatively straightforward to confirm that all the correct chains have been followed. But from a consumer's point of view, what checks can they realistically put in place to ensure they're getting the full picture? It seems they are essentially in pretty much the usual open world kind of situation, they may miss statements thanks to an error code somewhere down the line - or should we expect GRDDL-aware processors to notify the client of such circumstances? Back to the producer, if a (quasi-)static complete GRDDL result is readily available, what motivation have they to go down the GRDDL path, rather than simply <link alternate=... or conneg'ing to an RDF/XML representation? Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com ~ http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/this_weeks_semantic_web/
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 16:23:31 UTC