- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 04:47:34 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: "public-grddl-comments@w3.org" <public-grddl-comments@w3.org>, "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan, To my mind, a GRDDL "transformation" that is not machine interpretable defeats the purpose of using GRDDL: if one were going to do that, one might as well just do that from the OWL/XML namespace document. One doesn't need GRDDL for it. To be clear, if a document consumer had the built-in knowledge to recognize the OWL/XML GRDDL "transformation" URI and dispatch to a special OWL/XML --> RDF translator, then it could just as well have the built-in knowledge to recognize the OWL/XML namespace and dispatch to that same translator without involving GRDDL whatsoever. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2008 04:49:10 UTC