- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:09:35 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@ccf.org>, public-grddl-wg@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: >> People are reading the SHOULD as a MUST. > > Really? I am not. I just haven't seen a good reason to make > an exception in this case. > +1 (the definition of SHOULD is very good in my view, see RFC 2119, which I am sure Bijan knows ...) Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 15:11:28 UTC