RE: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases

Dave,

Thanks very much for this update.  With respect to #embedded-rdf4, the
problem with the test harness can be traced back to an RDF/XML parsing
problem in RDFLib[0].  My patch that addresses this bug has been
accepted by the RDFLib development team, so a development version, or
the next stable version, of RDFLib should fix the problem in the test
harness.

[0]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/0077.html

Take care,

    John L. Clark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-grddl-comments-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-grddl-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> Dave Beckett
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:11 AM
> To: public-grddl-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Raptor 1.4.16-pre testing with GRDDL Test Cases
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I have been testing Raptor against the GRDDL Test Cases as 
> described in
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests.rdf
>   Last-Modified: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:38:04 GMT using the 
> python test framework.
> 
> Raptor build info:
>   1) Raptor Subversion 1.4.16 pre-release Subversion r12344
>   2) libCURL 7.16.2 to retrieve URIs and handle redirections
>   3) libxml2 2.6.28 for XML DOM, XPath, ...
>   4) libxslt 1.1.20+ from Subversion
>        Last Changed Rev: 1429
>        Last Changed Date: 2007-05-31 12:40:11 -0700 (Thu, 31 May 2007)
>      to work around a bug.  This is fixed in libxslt release 1.1.21
> 
> The test suite was invoked as:
>   python $testsuite/testft.py \
>     --tester 'http://www.dajobe.org/foaf.rdf#me' \
>     --project 'http://librdf.org/raptor/raptor.rdf' \
>     --run '$rapper -m strict -i grddl -q -o rdfxml' \
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests 
> >raptor-earl.rdf \
> 
> This calls rapper in strict mode to disable looking for 
> microformats in HTML content.
> 
> 
> Test Failures
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 1) base-detail
> 
> This test should be removed from grddl-tests.rdf
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests#changelog
> says:
>   Revision 1.37  2007/04/30 15:42:38  cogbuji
>   removed  base-detail.  See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Apr/0264.html
> 
> 
> 2) embedded-rdf4
> 
> ### Embedded RDF using a relative xml:base ###
> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/embedded-rdf4
> running:  $rapper -m strict -i grddl -q -o rdfxml
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/embedded-rdf4
> Saving result to  embedded-rdf4-output.result
> Missing:  [(rdflib.URIRef('../..'),
> rdflib.URIRef('http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value'),
> rdflib.Literal('one', language=None, datatype=None))]
> 
> 
> Actual result from raptor (embedded-rdf4-output.result above):
> - ------
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:data-view="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view#"
> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/">
>     <rdf:value>one</rdf:value>
>   </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
> - ------
> which is the single triple:
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/>
> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value> "one" .
> 
> Expected result from
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/embedded-rdf4-output :
> <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/>
> <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#value> "one" .
> 
> So I think it's the fault of the test framework.
> 
> 
> Therefore, at this date I claim raptor passes all the GRDDL tests.
> 
> EARL file attached.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Dave
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQFGb3xuQ+ySUE9xlVoRAj/2AJ4yPfg2Owa7Ka0eiZEfY5RU4oYFlgCaAwQX
> 6CCjgXCBONNM7VMIUnO0Ubc=
> =8CQ2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 

===================================




Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.

Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 12:49:07 UTC