W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-comments@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: issue-dbooth-3: Ambiguity in an XML document's intended GRDDL results

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:59:03 -0700
Message-ID: <465D9F47.1010705@w3.org>
To: ogbujic@ccf.org
Cc: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>

Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> [...] As Murray has already
> mentioned
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/0074.html)
> the primary motivation for being silent with respect to XML processing
> models is because GRDDL simply does not have the authority to dictate an
> XML processing model that accounts for this initial ambiguity in the
> source document

That begs the question. GRDDL doesn't have the authority because
we chose not to give it that authority. There are other choices
we could have made.

Again, in the comments list, please let's stick to recorded
positions of the WG.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 15:59:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:29 UTC