- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:59:03 -0700
- To: ogbujic@ccf.org
- Cc: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > [...] As Murray has already > mentioned > (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/0074.html) > the primary motivation for being silent with respect to XML processing > models is because GRDDL simply does not have the authority to dictate an > XML processing model that accounts for this initial ambiguity in the > source document That begs the question. GRDDL doesn't have the authority because we chose not to give it that authority. There are other choices we could have made. Again, in the comments list, please let's stick to recorded positions of the WG. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 30 May 2007 15:59:13 UTC